Yaser Salari; mohammad nejati
Abstract
AbstractMulla Sadra believes in interpreting the event of the Resurrection that both the minor and the great resurrection have been realized in the direction of nature and self, and in the interpretation of the Qur'an, he has interpreted the verses related to the realization of the Resurrection and the ...
Read More
AbstractMulla Sadra believes in interpreting the event of the Resurrection that both the minor and the great resurrection have been realized in the direction of nature and self, and in the interpretation of the Qur'an, he has interpreted the verses related to the realization of the Resurrection and the bloating as a mati. In a strange claim, Dr. Soroush considers mulla Sadra's interpretive approach as a means of acknowledging and accepting the basis of the dream of revelation and speaks to himself about the co-ordination of the voices of the muslims. In reviewing and criticizing this claim, which has been done by descriptive and analytical method, two main issues come to mind: first, contrary to Soroush's claim, Mulla Sadra's belief in the realization of the Resurrection is based on his intellectual and philosophical foundations in transcendental wisdom and has nothing to do with the dreaming of revelation. The second issue is that the correct understanding of Mulla Sadra's view of the resurrection will indicate the addressing aspect of the Qur'an. Because from Sadra's point of view, regardless of the prophet's dream and dream, both the soghra and the great resurrection have been realized objectively and its uprising toward different people can be old or late because of their differences in existence.
Yaser Salari; Mahdi Afchangi
Abstract
AbstractSeyyed Abdul Aala Sabzevari, one of the great contemporary thinkers, is not only a commentator on transcendent wisdom but also a critic of Mulla Sadra's views on many philosophical principles and issues. His critical position on various issues of transcendent philosophy and emphasis on the use ...
Read More
AbstractSeyyed Abdul Aala Sabzevari, one of the great contemporary thinkers, is not only a commentator on transcendent wisdom but also a critic of Mulla Sadra's views on many philosophical principles and issues. His critical position on various issues of transcendent philosophy and emphasis on the use of the Qur'an and Sunnah, as well as the comparison of the early years of his education in Mashhad with the establishment of ideas of school of separation(Tafkik);caused to consider to Seyyed Sabzevari as a separation cractable, and as a result has not been given the necessary attention to his philosophical and theological thoughts. But, can Seyyed Sabzevari be considered a follower of this school? The answer is no. Although the promise of verbal sharing, originality of nature, denial of the unity of existence, and some other issues, as well as some of his positions on the separation of reason and quotation, bring Sabzevari closer to school of separation(Tafkik)beliefs, but he has a special and different method from what is presented in the school of separation(Tafkik), in use of quotation and to seek help from reason In understanding the Qur'an and Sunnah,. The present article responds to the above doubt by examining the opinions of Sabzevari professors and analyzing the extent of their influence, comparing and analyzing the ideas of Sabzevari with the opinions of thinkers of the school of separation(Tafkik) and the differences between them in explaining the Qur'an and Sunnah.
